Fødevareallergier
Checks declared allergens and ingredient matches against your profile. If the source data is incomplete, Diet Scan says that safety cannot be reliably confirmed.
Every portion is assessed against your selected diets, allergies, nutrition goals, current symptoms and repeated diary associations — with the factors and missing data shown clearly.
Checks declared allergens and ingredient matches against your profile. If the source data is incomplete, Diet Scan says that safety cannot be reliably confirmed.
Reviews gluten-containing ingredients and the available allergen declaration. Packaging and cross-contact information remain decisive for celiac safety.
Looks for lactose and dairy sources, then weighs the portion and your recorded tolerance of similar meals.
Flags common high-histamine or histamine-liberating ingredients and gives extra weight to your own recorded responses, which can vary considerably.
Assesses the total fat load, fried preparation, portion size and your previous tolerance when gallbladder sensitivity is relevant.
Considers active symptoms, fat, fibre, preparation and your diary pattern to support a more cautious choice during Crohn’s disease.
Balances fibre, fat, portion size, current symptoms and your own response history in the context of ulcerative colitis.
Reviews likely fermentable ingredients, portion size and repeated personal triggers. Low-FODMAP tolerance is individual and phase-dependent.
Considers portion size, fat, spicy or acidic ingredients, caffeine, alcohol and your previous reflux-related responses.
Looks at alcohol, spices, acidity, fat, portion size and personal tolerance when the stomach is sensitive or gastritis is relevant.
Assesses alcohol, sugars, saturated fat and the energy load of the portion in the context of fatty liver disease (MASLD).
Calculates the carbohydrate and sugar load of the selected portion and considers fibre and your personal nutrition context.
Reviews sodium, potassium, phosphorus and protein against the restrictions in your profile, and clearly marks missing mineral data.
Calculates salt and sodium for the portion and highlights choices that may conflict with a personal low-sodium target.
Looks for common high-purine ingredients and alcohol, considers the portion, and suggests a lower-purine adjustment where possible.
Assesses fat, fried preparation, portion size and current symptoms after gallbladder removal, while marking details a food scan cannot verify.
Checks fibre, whole grains, skins, seeds, nuts and raw produce against a low-residue or low-fibre requirement.
Reviews alcohol, caffeine, acidity, spices, fat and portion size when peptic-ulcer symptoms or gastric sensitivity are relevant.
Looks for high fat, lactose, caffeine, alcohol, spicy foods and sugar alcohols that may worsen diarrhoea, while marking missing hydration context.
Assesses fibre and meal composition for constipation support and makes clear that fluid intake cannot be verified from a food scan.
Adapts the fibre assessment to whether symptoms are active: lower residue during a flare and adequate fibre outside an acute phase.
Treats alcohol and high-fat or fried meals as major conflicts in pancreatitis and uses a conservative safety-first result.
Evaluates fat, fibre and portion volume because smaller, lower-fat and lower-fibre meals are often easier to manage with gastroparesis.
Checks alcohol, saturated fat, sugars and energy load in a liver-support context without replacing the treatment plan for hepatitis.
Assesses alcohol, sodium, energy and protein while flagging that cirrhosis requirements depend on the individual treatment plan.
Focuses on fat load, fried preparation and current symptoms where impaired bile flow or cholestasis affects tolerance.
Combines carbohydrate, sugar, saturated-fat, sodium and energy signals for a metabolic-syndrome assessment.
Compares the portion’s energy density, protein, fibre and remaining daily target with the selected weight-management goal.
Detects gluten-containing grains and weighs portion and recorded tolerance, without treating sensitivity as celiac disease or wheat allergy.
Uses a strict wheat safety gate across ingredients and allergen declarations; incomplete labelling cannot produce a safe result.
Uses a strict milk-protein safety gate covering milk, casein and whey; lactose-free does not mean milk-protein-free.
Looks for high-fructose ingredients and polyol combinations, then weighs portion size and repeated personal responses.
Treats fructose, sucrose and sorbitol sources as serious conflicts and requires verified ingredients for hereditary fructose intolerance.
Detects sorbitol and related polyols, accounts for portion size and uses recorded digestive responses as supporting evidence.
Reviews sodium, potassium, phosphorus, protein and portion size against dialysis-related needs, clearly marking unavailable mineral data.
Assesses sodium, animal-protein and common high-oxalate ingredients while noting that stone type and hydration remain essential context.
Measures sodium, saturated fat, fibre and energy balance against the core DASH pattern.
Combines saturated fat, sodium, fibre, sugars and preparation to assess how closely a portion supports a cardioprotective pattern.
Uses strict sodium thresholds and portion context for heart failure, while flagging that fluid limits cannot be confirmed from a food scan.
Flags major vitamin-K sources and uses diary consistency as context; it never recommends avoiding vitamin K or changing warfarin dosing.
Checks alcohol, high-mercury fish, unpasteurised foods, raw animal products and caffeine, alongside protein and energy adequacy.
Combines pregnancy food-safety checks with carbohydrate, sugar, fibre and portion assessment for gestational diabetes.
Reviews alcohol, caffeine, protein, energy and overall meal adequacy during breastfeeding without making claims about milk supply.
Flags common dietary migraine associations such as alcohol, aged foods, nitrites, MSG and high caffeine, weighted by the personal diary.
Calculates carbohydrate load as a strict therapeutic-ketogenic factor and states when the clinician-set ketogenic ratio cannot be verified.
Flags aspartame and high-protein sources and marks missing phenylalanine data; a prescribed PKU allowance remains decisive.
Looks for organ meats, red meat, iron-fortified products and alcohol while marking missing iron data and individual iron status.
Assesses whether the portion provides meaningful energy and protein for malnutrition or unintentional weight-loss support.
Checks protein and energy per portion against recovery needs and identifies meals that are too small or protein-poor.
Reviews food safety, protein, energy and symptom tolerance while requiring the oncology team’s treatment-specific restrictions.
Assesses likely texture and choking risk from the available description, but requires verified consistency for a dependable dysphagia result.
Til diæter, allergier og kroniske sygdomme. Scan din mad og få et personligt svar.